It Was Apple, Not AT&T That Nuked Google Voice on the iPhone

So we had the FCC looking to investigate AT&T and Apple for possible antitrust operations at the thought that AT&T had forced Apple to deny the coveted Google Voice iPhone app. The app would let you send free text messages, and make international calls for only 2 cents. So why did Apple feel the need to deny the app?

iphone-google-voice.jpeg

Apple’s Response to Google Voice

Question 1. Why did Apple reject the Google Voice application for iPhone and remove related third-party applications from its App Store? In addition to Google Voice, which related third-party applications were removed or have been rejected? Please provide the specific name of each application and the contact information for the developer.

Contrary to published reports, Apple has not rejected the Google Voice application, and continues to study it. The application has not been approved because, as submitted for review, it appears to alter the iPhone’s distinctive user experience by replacing the iPhone’s core mobile telephone functionality and Apple user interface with its own user interface for telephone calls, text messaging and voicemail. Apple spent a lot of time and effort developing this distinct and innovative way to seamlessly deliver core functionality of the iPhone. For example, on an iPhone, the “Phone” icon that is always shown at the bottom of the Home Screen launches Apple’s mobile telephone application, providing access to Favorites, Recents, Contacts, a Keypad, and Visual Voicemail. The Google Voice application replaces Apple’s Visual Voicemail by routing calls through a separate Google Voice telephone number that stores any voicemail, preventing voicemail from being stored on the iPhone, i.e., disabling Apple’s Visual Voicemail. Similarly, SMS text messages are managed through the Google hub—replacing the iPhone’s text messaging feature. In addition, the iPhone user’s entire Contacts database is transferred to Google’s servers, and we have yet to obtain any assurances from Google that this data will only be used in appropriate ways. These factors present several new issues and questions to us that we are still pondering at this time.

  • you sure don't make it difficult to locate vulnerabilities. you n00b bloggers are hilarious. you all think you're doing people a favor or maybe you're making a whopping $0.12 a month off all these fucktarded ads, the reality is, you're giving less informed people confidence in REALLY stupid solutions making them far more vulnerable to the vicious cycle of stupidness created by dumb fuck bloggers such as yourself.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Close